History Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

History - Assignment Example In the final section, she shocks him by saying they have never had a serious conversation in the course of their whole marriage. She also declares that she has a holy duty to herself. The very idea is shocking to her husband. 2. Read â€Å"The Voice of Zionism: Theorod Herzl and the Jewish State† and answer the following – Why did Herzl believe that Palestine was necessary for Jews? How does he seek to gain the acceptance of the Turkish sultan and the Christian nations of Europe? (see the box on pg 608) The story of the creation of Israel is a powerful one. Herzl was one of the founding thinkers on this issue. He argues in this piece that anti-semitism was such a serious problem in European countries that there was no possibility it would get better. He thought Jews should give up on Europe and seek to create a new land. He even thought European governments would help them as they would be eager to see them go. He writes that the Sultan would might be willing to give th em Palestine if they offered to help him look after the finances of his Empire. He also suggests that the Jews would create an outpost of civilization in the Middle East where everywhere else there was only barbarism. That idea might help to convince Europeans too. I.D. the following terms in paragraph format. Make sure you include ALL INFORMATION from the book: Do NOT just copy from the book. You must put these in your own words. (worth 10 points each) 1. caudillos Caudillos were military-style political leaders in Latin America in the 19th century. They were not democratic-minded and usually took power by force. They had a major impact on the development of these states and offered pursued expansionist policies. They often named themselves president for life and became dictators. Some examples were Rafael Carrera and Juan Manuel de Rosas. They secured gains made during the anti-colonial upheavals. Part of the reason they were able to take power was because none of these countries has any experience of governing themselves. 2. Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 This was an act of Congress that played a significant role in the development of the Civil War that would follow a few years later. At the time, the North and South of the Untied States were divided on the issue of slavery. Both Kansas and Nebraska were to be new states. Some people such as Stephen Douglas believed the resolution to the dispute between North and South was simply to let new states decide if they wanted to permit slavery or not. In a sense this was a naive idea, as northern abolitionists strongly opposed expanding slavery within the boundaries of the U.S under any circumstances. This issue would come to dominate the American political landscape in the years to come. 3. Emmeline Pankhurst, Christabel & Sylvia Emmeline was the leader of the British women's suffragette movement. She advocated for Women to have the right to vote. Some of her tactics were occasionally violent and she served prison s entences for them. Two of her daughters were Christabel and Sylvia, who took differing sides in the debate. Sylvia pursued an organizational movement and was more politically active. Christabel was the head of the women's movement and supported more militant action. All of these women made a major contribution to democracy when their actions contributed to the success of the

Criminal Conspiracy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Criminal Conspiracy - Essay Example & Scheb, (2011), the main aim for the reformation of this system was that it was to temporarily curb the pending review and reform the law relating to fraud, offensiveness and indecency as well as shaping the view of society as a whole. The law has now been reformed by the Fraud Acts in which the government waits to see how the law operates so as to come up with relative changes or abolish common law conspiracy to defraud. International trade has also seen various cases of fraud and the United Stated has moved in to combat such as well as get rid of some of the practices such as washing dirty money that comes with many conspiracy cases. Major problems were experienced in the early years after Acts over how the preserved common law conspiracy to defraud dovetailed with the new statutory conspiracy to commit a crime as frequently, an agreement to defraud will necessarily involve an agreement to commit a substantive offence entailing dishonesty such as theft or the new offence of fraud under the Fraud Act. A typical example would be when A and B agree a scheme to dupe people into investing money in a non-existent company intending to disappear with the money subscribed. To do this would be to certainly agree to defraud the investors, but it will also be an agreement to commit the crime of fraud by false representation in benefit of an individual, (Levy, Karst & Winkler, 2000). According to the Missouri revised statutes, a person is guilty of conspiracy with another person to commit an offense it he agrees with another person that one of them or both engage in a conduct that constitutes conspiracy. Conspiring also with a third party knowingly will also make the other two parties guilty of conspiracy whether the identities are known or not. Further conspiracy may be committed by a person conspiring to commit a number of offences that have the same results as conspiracy on the other hand no one shall be convicted if he prevented the accomplishment of the objectives of